<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>The Progressive Electorate - Recent Comments</title>
    <link>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com</link>
    <description>The Progressive Electorate</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 10:50:34 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>there's nothing wrong with holding firm</title>
      <link>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3695</link>
      <description>on principles but to be an effective lawmaker you need to be somewhat flexible and deferring. Kucinich never shows the ability to compromise. &amp;nbsp;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 04:56:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>admin</author>
      <guid>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3695</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>But</title>
      <link>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3694</link>
      <description>there are many people who actually rank below Kucinich. &amp;nbsp;Not to mention, no matter how much he twists arms he's in the minority and at times will go against the Democratic leadership. &amp;nbsp;So I think he's doing all right for himself (if &amp;nbsp;not great or even that good), and it's not a coincidence that this idea of Kucinich being ineffective came up after a lot on the left starting hating on him.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 04:20:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>rossl</author>
      <guid>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3694</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Remember Sonny Bono's widow took over his House seat?</title>
      <link>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3693</link>
      <description>Kucinich was sworn in in Jan 1997. Mary &lt;a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/person.xpd?id=400039"&gt;Bono Mack&lt;/a&gt; R-CA-45 took office in April 1998.&#xD;&lt;p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Mary Bono Mack has sponsored 63 bills since Jan 7, 1997 of which 44 haven't made it out of committee and 7 were successfully enacted. Bono Mack has co-sponsored 1,099 bills during the same time period. (The count of enacted bills considers only bills actually sponsored by Bono Mack and companion bills identified by CRS that were themselves enacted, but not if they were incorporated into other bills, as that information is not readily available.) &lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&lt;p&gt;Yes, she was in the majority for most of that time, so maybe not a fair comparison. Her two biggies were after the Nov 2006 election while Hastert was a lame duck Speaker.&#xD;&lt;p&gt;H.R. 1953: To authorize leases for terms not to exceed 99 years on land held in trust for the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians and the Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians of the Guidiville Indian Rancheria.	Enacted	Jun 21, 2000&#xD;&lt;p&gt;H.R. 3676: Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument Act of 2000	Enacted	Oct 24, 2000&#xD;&lt;p&gt;H.R. 3657: To provide for the conveyance of a small parcel of public domain land in the San Bernardino National Forest in the State of California, and for other purposes.	Enacted	Nov 6, 2000&#xD;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;H.R. 6143: Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment Modernization Act of 2006	Enacted	Dec 19, 2006&#xD;&lt;p&gt;H.R. 6429: Fallen Firefighters Assistance Tax Clarification Act of 2006	Enacted	Dec 21, 2006&lt;/b&gt;&#xD;&lt;p&gt;H.R. 4841: Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Settlement Act	Enacted	Jul 31, 2008&#xD;&lt;p&gt;H.R. 6085: To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 42222 Rancho Las Palmas Drive in Rancho Mirage, California, as the "Gerald R. Ford Post Office Building".	Enacted	Aug 12, 2008</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 01:20:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>CA Berkeley WV</author>
      <guid>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3693</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How does that compare</title>
      <link>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3692</link>
      <description>to the rest of Congress? &amp;nbsp;I don't think he's particularly ineffective, although he's certainly no Ted Kennedy.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:00:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>rossl</author>
      <guid>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3692</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I don't like term limts</title>
      <link>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3691</link>
      <description>Look what they have done for the Calif. legislature and the inability to run the state government, that and ballot initiatives.&#xD;&lt;p&gt;Low information voters. I am sure his district has no clue. It's like my rep, Capito, explanation that she did not have to actually do anything while Hastert was Speaker because she was on the Rules Committee. Now she is on the &lt;a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/02/dems-to-celebrate-stimulus-anniversary-by-slamming-gop.php"&gt;list&lt;/a&gt; of stimulus hypocrites. She is in her fifth term.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:38:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>CA Berkeley WV</author>
      <guid>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3691</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>is he capable of another approach?</title>
      <link>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3690</link>
      <description>not sure he is. Dennis K could be a poster boy for the term limits argument</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:29:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>admin</author>
      <guid>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3690</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>His record is 3 for 97</title>
      <link>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3689</link>
      <description>in &lt;a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/person.xpd?id=400227"&gt;getting bills&lt;/a&gt; passed.&#xD;&lt;p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Dennis Kucinich has sponsored 97 bills since Jan 7, 1997 of which 93 haven't made it out of committee and 3 were successfully enacted. Kucinich has co-sponsored 2,924 bills during the same time period. (The count of enacted bills considers only bills actually sponsored by Kucinich and companion bills identified by CRS that were themselves enacted, but not if they were incorporated into other bills, as that information is not readily available.) &lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/03/10/kos_kucinich/index.html"&gt;Ineffective&lt;/a&gt; at the minimum.&#xD;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The three that were enacted are, in chronological order from first to last: A bill "to make available to the Ukranian Museum and Archives the USIA television program 'Window on America,'" a bill "to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 14500 Lorain Avenue in Cleveland, Ohio as the 'John P. Gallagher Post Office Building" and a bill "proclaiming Casimir Pulaski to be an honorary citizen of the United States posthumously."&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;&lt;br /&gt;Maybe he needs a different approach.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:14:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>CA Berkeley WV</author>
      <guid>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3689</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kucinich isn't the deciding factor</title>
      <link>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3688</link>
      <description>although just because he's for single payer and compromised on public option doesn't mean he shouldn't vote for this. &#xD;&lt;p&gt;the members of his district are the ones that will have to decide if they want to keep him. &#xD;&lt;p&gt;Dennis is no doubt a smart guy. I've just never truly understood whether he is that principled or if he's an attention seeker</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:59:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>admin</author>
      <guid>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3688</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tips for Truth and Justice</title>
      <link>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3687</link>
      <description>Give me accountability or give me my fucking chains now&#xD;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://pic80.picturetrail.com:80/VOL2135/12119137/22289028/369542007.jpg" border="0" alt="Image Hosting by PictureTrail.com"&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:26:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>MinistryOfTruth</author>
      <guid>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3687</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Great idea</title>
      <link>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3686</link>
      <description>Let's shed some light on these jokers so that swing voters are turned off by them.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 06:11:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>pistolSO</author>
      <guid>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3686</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>gohmert called the white house a circus</title>
      <link>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3685</link>
      <description>it was a typical GOP rant. &amp;nbsp;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:30:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>admin</author>
      <guid>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3685</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Not a bad idea for a project</title>
      <link>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3684</link>
      <description>Didn't Louis Gomert out on Texas go birther today, and Paul Broun the week before.&#xD;&lt;p&gt;Are these idiots really going to run on the hopes that enough BIRTHERS are going to vote for them? They do know that you win elections by getting a MAJORITY to vote for you, right?&#xD;&lt;p&gt;Then again, Gomert is in TX, and not to bask TX, but 19% of the GOP promary voters for Governor voted for Debbie Medina, not just a teabagger, but a TRUTHER too.&#xD;&lt;p&gt;Houston, we have a WTF!</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:28:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>MinistryOfTruth</author>
      <guid>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3684</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>birther diary</title>
      <link>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3683</link>
      <description>good call - we should keep a roll call list of the birthers in Congress so we can do a diary. &#xD;&lt;p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:13:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>admin</author>
      <guid>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3683</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Portman is a fucking idiot, he just set his own trap</title>
      <link>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3682</link>
      <description>by leaving himself open to being called a birther he is pandering to the racist, paranoid CT driven GOP base and waiving goodbye to the African American vote, which is essential in Ohio, especially high voter concentration area like Clevland, Akron and Cincy.&#xD;&lt;p&gt;Great find, great research, and you gave me an idea for a youtube/TV ad. How many GOP Sen Candidates are birther/racists?&#xD;&lt;p&gt;Because why else would someone think this President isn't American? I have two answers, his skin color, and his name doesn't sound like John Smith. Both = racism</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:10:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>MinistryOfTruth</author>
      <guid>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3682</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>And a WATB</title>
      <link>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3681</link>
      <description>The rare GOP trifecta.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 03:54:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Casual Wednesday</author>
      <guid>http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/showComment.do?commentId=3681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

